Travis Industries Liberty User manual

OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
Non-Confidential Business Information
(Non-CBI)
Certification Test Report
Travis Industries, Inc.
Wood-Fired Freestanding Room Heater
Model: Liberty
Prepared for: Travis Industries, Inc.
12521 Harbour Reach Drive
Mukilteo, WA 98275
USA
Prepared by: OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
13327 NE Airport Way
Portland, OR 97230
[phone]
Test Period: September 10, 2019 –September 12, 2019
Report Issued: September 27, 2019
Report Number: 0028WS065E
All data and information contained in this report are confidential and proprietary to Travis
Industries, Inc. Its significance is subject to the adequacy and representative character of the
samples and to the comprehensiveness of the tests, examinations, or surveys made. The
contents of this report cannot be copied or quoted, except in full, without specific, written
authorization from Travis Industries, Inc. and OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc. No use of the
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc. name, logo, or registered mark (O-TL) is permitted, except as
expressly authorized by OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc. in writing.
-Document Edition # 000 (9/27/19)-

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES
This report has been reviewed and approved by the following authorized signatories:
Evaluator:
__________________________
Bruce Davis, Technician
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
Reviewer:
__________________________
Alex Tiegs, President
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE...............................................................................................................(3 pages)
1. SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TEST RESULTS........................................................4
Introduction..........................................................................................................................5
Individual Run summaries ...................................................................................................6
Summary Tables
Table 1 - Particulate Emissions Results...............................................................................7
Table 2 - Particulate Emissions Results (First Hour)...........................................................7
Table 3 – B415.1 Efficiency and CO Emissions .................................................................7
Table 4 - Test Facility Conditions .......................................................................................8
Table 5 – Kindling and Start-up Fuel Description Summary ..............................................8
Table 6 - Fuel Measurements and Cordwood Descriptions - Test.......................................9
Table 7 - Dilution Tunnel Gas Measurements and Sampling Data .....................................9
Table 10 - Test Configurations ..........................................................................................10
2. PHOTOGRAPHS/APPLIANCE DESCRIPTION/DRAWINGS......................................11
Fuel Photographs ...............................................................................................................13
Appliance Description .......................................................................................................20
3. TEST DATA BY RUN......................................................................................................21
Run 1..................................................................................................................................26
Run 2..................................................................................................................................45
Run 3..................................................................................................................................54
Run 4..................................................................................................................................60
Run 5 ……………………………………………………………………………….……71
Run 6 …………………………………………………………………………………….77
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ..........................................................87
Sample Analysis.................................................................................................................89
Calibrations – EPA Method 28R, ASTM E2515, ASTM E3053 ....................................100
Example Calculations ......................................................................................................118
5. LABELING & OWNER’S MANUAL............................................................................131
Appendix A Alt-125 E3053 Letter

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
Section 1
Sampling Procedures and Test Results
4 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
INTRODUCTION
Travis Industries, Inc. retained OMNI to perform U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
certification testing on the Liberty Freestanding woodstove. The Liberty Freestanding wood
stove is a Non-Catalytic-type room heater. The firebox is constructed of mild steel. Usable
firebox volume was measured to be 3.65 cubic feet and the stove is vented through 6” flue collar
located on the stove top.
Testing was performed at Travis Industries. The altitude of the laboratory is 108 feet above sea
level. The unit was received in good condition and logged in on 9/9/2019, then assigned and
labeled with OMNI ID #2384. OMNI representative Bruce Davis conducted the certification
testing and completed all testing by September 12, 2019.
This report is organized in accordance with the EPA-recommended outline and is summarized in
the Table of Contents immediately preceding this section. The results in this report are limited to
the item submitted.
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
The Answe wood stove was tested in accordance with the U.S. EPA 40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart AAA –Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters using EPA
Method 28R, ASTM E2515 and EPA Alt-125, ASTM E3053. Particulate emissions were
measured using sampling trains consisting of two Teflon coated 47mm filters (front and back).
See Appendix A for details on EPA Alt-125.
The model Liberty was tested for thermal efficiency and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions in
accordance with CSA B415.1-10 using Douglas Fir cordwood.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The weighted average emissions of the three test runs included in the results indicate a
particulate emission rate of 2.50 grams per hour. Particulate emissions used in the weighted
average were sampled on only one of the high burn fuel loads, test 3 and 5 were conducted to
generate a coal bed for test number 4 and 6. Run number 2 was considered invalid due to a fuel
load piece used for the test was outside the acceptable weight range. The Liberty results are
within the emission limit of 2.5 g/h for affected facilities tested with cordwood, manufactured on
or after May 15, 2020.
The proportionality results for all 3 test runs were acceptable. Quality check results for each test
run are presented in Section 2 of this report.
5 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
INDIVIDUAL RUN SUMMARIES
Run 1 - Test procedures followed to produce a high burn rate with a primary air setting of
fully open. Observed burn rate was calculated at 4.61 kg/hr. Emissions results
were calculated using particulate sampling from kindling, start-up fuel, and test
fuel load combined (cold to hot). Burn rate, and efficiency were calculated using
data from the test fuel load only (hot to hot). No sampling anomalies occurred,
this test run was determined to be valid for inclusion in the weighted average.
Run 2 - Test procedures were followed to produce a low burn rate with a primary air
setting of full closed. Observed burn rate was calculated at 1.36 kg/hr. Emissions
and efficiency results were calculated using a hot to hot burn cycle, a coal bed
generated by the high burn conducted in test one was used. Prior to starting run 3
a fire box volume drawing was submitted showing a volume larger than that
calculated by the testing laboratory. After review of the document it was agreed
that the larger volume calculated by a computer drawing program was accurate.
This caused one of the fuel load pieces used in the fuel load to be outside the
acceptable weight range. Due to this, test number 2 was considered invalid and
not used in the weighted average.
Run 3 - Test procedures followed to produce a high burn rate with a primary air setting of
fully open. Observed burn rate was calculated at 4.88 kg/hr. Burn rate was
calculated using data from the test fuel load only (hot to hot). No sampling
occurred during this test, it was conducted to generate a coal bed for test number
4.
Run 4 - Test procedures were followed to produce a medium high burn rate with a
primary air setting of 0.125”(1/8”) open. Observed burn rate was calculated at
1.74 kg/hr. Emissions and efficiency results were calculated using a hot to hot
burn cycle, a coal bed generated by the high burn conducted in test three was
used. No sampling anomalies occurred; this test run was determined to be valid
for inclusion in the weighted average.
Run 5 - Test procedures followed to produce a high burn rate with a primary air setting of
fully open. Observed burn rate was calculated at 5.73 kg/hr. Burn rate was
calculated using data from the test fuel load only (hot to hot). No sampling
occurred during this test; it was conducted to generate a coal bed for test number
6.
Run 6 - Test procedures were followed to produce a low burn rate with a primary air
setting of full closed. Observed burn rate was calculated at 1.18 kg/hr. Emissions
and efficiency results were calculated using a hot to hot burn cycle, a coal bed
generated by the high burn conducted in test one was used. No sampling
anomalies occurred; this test run was determined to be valid for inclusion in the
weighted average.
6 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
Table 1 –Particulate Emissions
Run
Burn Rate
Calculated from a
Hot to Hot burn
cycle
(kg/h dry)
ASTM E2515
Emissions
(g/h)
ASTM E3053
Weighting Factor
(%)
ASTM E3053 Weighted
Emissions
(g/h)
1
4.61
13.81
20
0.762
4
1.74
1.40
40
0.560
6
1.18
2.94
40
1.176
The sum of weighted particulate emission of 3 test runs, tests 1, 2, and 4: 0.762 +
0.560 + 1.176 = 2.50 grams per hour.
1. Based on a cold start including kindling and start-up fuel.
Table 2 –Particulate Emissions (First Hour)
Run
ASTM E2515
Emissions –First Hour
(g/h)
1
3.90
4
8.34
6
6.64
Table 3 –B415.1 Efficiency and CO Emissions
Run
Heat
Output
(BTU/h)
HHV
Efficiency
(%)
LHV
Efficiency
(%)
CO Emissions
(g/MJ Output)
CO Emissions
(g/kg Dry Fuel)
CO Emissions
(g/min)
1
63,239
71.1
76.9
1.99
28.03
2.210
4
22,845
70.0
75.7
7.03
97.53
2.822
6
15,155
68.2
73.7
11.67
157.78
3.108
Weighted average HHV efficiency of three test runs: 14.22 + 28.00 + 27.28 = 69.5%.
Average CO Emissions of three tests: (2.210 + 2.822 + 3.108) / 3 = 2.713 g/min
7 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
Table 4 –Test Facility Conditions
Run
Room Temperature
(°F)
Barometric Pressure
(Hg)
Air Velocity
(ft/min)
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
1
71
83
29.43
29.44
<50
<50
4
83
73
29.66
29.65
<50
<50
6
83
74
29.58
29.57
<50
<50
Table 5 –Kindling and Start-up Fuel Description Summary
Douglas Fir Cordwood
Run
Kindling
Weight
Wet Basis
(lbs)
Start-up
Fuel Weight
Wet Basis
(lbs)
Residual
Start-up
fuel weight
(lbs)
1
7.30
11.0
4.0
3
5.90
10.20
3.9
5
6.20
9.80
3.9
Note: Test 3 and 5 were high burn tests used to create a coal bed for test number 4 and 6, no
particulate sampling occurred during tests 3 and 5.
8 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
Table 6 –Fuel Measurement and Cordwood Description Summary –TEST
Douglas Fir CEditio
Run
Test Fuel
Wet Basis
(lbs)
Firebox
Volume
(ft3)
Fuel Loading
Density Wet
Basis
(lbs/ft3)
Test Fuel
Dry Basis
(lbs)
Test Fuel
Consumed
During Test
Dry Basis
(lbs)
Piece
Length
(in)
1
37.02
3.65
10.1
30.78 + 15.78
38.6
4@16”
2@18”
2
43.41
3.65
11.9
35.93
35.9
5@16”
2@18”
3
35.08
3.65
9.6
28.71 + 13.87
34.8
4@16”
2@18”
4
42.36
3.65
11.6
35.06
35.1
4@16”
2@18”
5
35.51
3.65
9.7
29.07 + 13.62
35.0
4@16”
2@18”
6
44.91
3.65
12.3
37.35
37.4
4@16”
3@18”
Table 7 –Dilution Tunnel Gas Measurements and Sampling Data Summary
Run
Length of Test
(min)
Average Dilution Tunnel Gas Measurements
Velocity
(ft/sec)
Flow Rate
(dscf/min)
Temperature
(°F)
1
230
21.17
210.9
142
4
550
21.92
234.8
104
6
860
21.29
232.1
92
9 of 241

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Liberty
Report Number:0028WS065E
OMNI-Test Laboratories, Inc.
Table 10 –Test Configurations
Run
Startup Procedures
Combustion Air
1
Fuel Loading: Kindling and start-up fuel loaded together, a torch was used for 20
seconds to establish a fire. At 70 minutes placed fuel load into the firebox and
closed the loading door. Loading required less than 1 minute to complete.
Door: For kindling and start-up fuel, loading door was closed by 45 seconds. Test
fuel load; fuel loading door was closed at 60 seconds.
Primary Air: Air control fully open for the entire test.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan turned to high automatically approximately 45 minutes after starting
kindling fire, remained on high for the entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used
Fully open for entire
test.
2
Fuel Loading: Test fuel loaded onto coal bed generated by test number 1 in 50
seconds.
Door: Closed by 4 minutes, 10 seconds.
Primary Air: Fully open until 6:10, then set to 5/16”from full closed. At 16 minutes
air control set to fully closed.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan on high entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used
Fully Closed
3
Fuel Loading: Kindling and start-up fuel loaded together, a torch was used for 15
seconds to establish a fire. Fuel loading required 30 seconds to complete.
Door: For kindling and start-up fuel, loading door was closed by 30 seconds. Test
fuel load; fuel loading door was closed 45seconds after loading.
Primary Air: Air control fully open for the entire test.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan turned to high automatically approximately 45 minutes after starting
kindling fire, remained on high for the entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used
Fully open for entire
test.
4
Fuel Loading: Test fuel loaded onto coal bed generated by test number 3 in 60
seconds.
Door: Closed by 4:45 minutes.
Primary Air: Fully open, then set to test setting at 15 minutes.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan on high entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used.
0.125”from full
closed
5
Fuel Loading: Kindling and start-up fuel loaded together, a torch was used for 35
seconds to establish a fire. Fuel loading required 50 seconds to complete.
Door: For kindling and start-up fuel, loading door was closed by 40 seconds. Test
fuel load; fuel loading door was closed 60 seconds after loading.
Primary Air: Air control fully open for the entire test.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan turned to high automatically approximately 45 minutes after starting
kindling fire, remained on high for the entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used.
Fully open for entire
test.
6
Fuel Loading: Test fuel loaded onto coal bed generated by test number 5 by 70
seconds.
Door: Closed by 140 seconds.
Primary Air: Fully open until 5:00, then set to 5/16”from full closed. At 15 minutes
air control set to fully closed.
Secondary: No user control for secondary air.
Fan: Fan on high entire test.
Bypass: Bypass not used.
Fully open for first 5
minutes then set to
5/16”, at 15 minutes
air set to full closed.
10 of 241