
4 Centinel Spine prodisc C Vivo Surgical Technique
INTENDED USE, INDICATIONS
AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
Intended use
prodisc C Vivo implants are used to replace a cervical inter-
vertebral disc, to restore disc height and maintain
segmental motion.
Successful clinical outcomes depend on a number of critical
factors, including:
•Completion of a training program on the use of
prodisc C, prodisc C Nova or prodisc C Vivo
•Proper patient selection
•Adequate bone quality (investigation todetermine
bone quality isrecommended)
•Complete and meticulous discectomy, decompression,
and remobilization of the disc space
•Optimal implant sizing and placement
•Postoperative treatment
Indications
Symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD), which is defined
as neck or arm (radicular) pain and/or a functional/neuro-
logical deficit with at least one of the following conditions
confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI, or x-rays):
•herniated nucleus pulposus
•spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes)
•loss of disc height
Specific contraindications
•Fractures, infections, tumors
•Spinal stenosis by hypertrophic spondylarthrosis
•Severe facet joint degeneration
•Segmental instability
•Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
General contraindications
•Osteoporosis, osteochondrosis, and severe osteopenia
•Acute or chronic systemic, spinal, or localized
infections
•Systemic and metabolic diseases
•Any medical and surgical conditions precluding
the benefits of spinal surgery
•Foreign body sensitivity to the implant materials
•Pregnancy
•Severe obesity (Body Mass Index above 40)
Patient exclusion recommendations
Patient selection is one of the most important factors
contributing to the outcome of the total disc replace-
ment procedure. The following may affect clinical out-
comes:
•A condition of senility or mental illness, alcoholism
or smoking
•Dependency on pharmaceutical drugs or drug abuse
•The patient’s occupation or activity level
•Compromised vertebral bodies at affected level due
to current or past trauma (fractures)
•Substantial loss of disc height, where applied segmen-
tal distraction may lead to damage of the great vessels
•Involved vertebral endplate dimensionally smaller than
the minimum implant footprint size in both the medial-
lateral and the anteriorposterior directions
•Severe abnormality of the endplate (e.g. large Schmorl
nodes)