Adaptec Series 6 Reference guide

>
ZERO-MAINTENANCE CACHE PROTECTION BRIEF
Reduced Data Center Operating Costs and Maximum
Protection for Cached Data
Highlights
Low Operating Costs
– No installation, monitoring,
maintenance, disposal or
replacement costs due to
batteries
No Data Loss from Power
Failures
– Replaces lithium ion batteries
Maintenance-free Cached Data
Protection
– No need to monitor battery
charge level
– No shutdown required for
battery replacement
– Protects data indefinitely — no
need to rush to restart systems
“before the battery runs out”
– Stores protected data for years
Instant RAID Cache Protection
– Charges in minutes instead of
hours
– RAID performance optimized
immediately
Environmentally Conscious
– No toxic battery disposal
– Works in conjunction with
Adaptec Intelligent Power
Management for industry’s
‘greenest’ solution
- Simplified IATA compliance
Available fully integrated on
Series 5Z and Series 6Q RAID
controllers and as an add-on
kit for Series 6 RAID controllers
IDC estimates that the cost of operating a
piece of IT equipment over a four year period
may be four times greater than the original
cost of acquiring it.
Adaptec Series 6, Series 6Q with maxCache
2.0 and Series 5Z RAID controllers with
Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection (ZMCP
— pronounced “zemcap”) provide maximum
protection for cached data and eliminate the
substantial costs and environmental impact
of complex, messy and expensive Lithium Ion
batteries, while improving cache protection
and cache performance.
Why do you need Cache Protection?
e adoption of RAID 5 and 6 continues to
grow in enterprise storage systems as users
continue to be concerned about optimizing
capacity utilization for rapidly growing data
sets. However, optimal performance can suer
unless the system is operated with all available
caches enabled.
With controller cache enabled, however, data
is stored in the controller’s memory and can be
lost when a system power outage occurs. e
most common protection against this scenario
is to backup the controller cache with a battery
backup unit (BBU) installed directly on the
controller. is battery is used to maintain
the data of the on-board memory cache until
power can be resupplied to the unit.
A second use for the BBU is in connection
with Adaptec’s Intelligent Power Management
which is oered on Adaptec Series 6, Series
6Q, Series 5Z, Series 5 and Series 2 RAID
controller families. In order for the controller
to slow down or stop disk drives there must
be no I/O activity to the disk. However, many
operating systems do very low, but non-zero,
levels of I/O all the time — even when all
applications are idle. e on-board memory
cache on the Adaptec controllers can play an
important role in supporting Intelligent
Power Management by absorbing these
I/O requests and saving them in memory,
instead of spinning up disk drives that would
otherwise be idle. Of course, this approach is
only fail-safe if the contents of the on-board
memory are preserved across a power outage.
Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
Despite their obvious value, BBUs (available
for Series 5) are not the optimal solution:
they must usually be purchased separately
from the controller card, and require constant
monitoring, maintenance and replacement.
Old batteries must be disposed of in an
environmentally-responsible manner.
Adaptec Series 6, Series 6Q with maxCache
2.0 and Series 5Z controllers oer a dierent
approach: Zero-Maintenance Cache
Protection.
e basic idea of ZMCP is to detect the loss
of power to the controller and then to copy
the data in the on-board controller cache to
non-volatile location — in this case NAND
ash memory of a type similar to that used
in USB thumb drives and solid state disks.
is process is supported by a super capacitor
that keeps the necessary parts of the controller
active for the time required to perform the
NAND ash copy.
Once the data has been copied to the ash
memory the controller no longer needs power
in order to preserve the data.
When power is nally returned to the
controller, the data in the ash memory
are copied back to the on-board controller
cache and operation resumes as normal
with all outstanding I/O requests preserved.
>
Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
for Series 6, Series 6Q
and Series 5Z RAID Controllers

Adaptec Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
ZERO-MAINTENANCE CACHE PROTECTION BRIEF
ZMCP Benefits Relative to BBUs
While BBUs have been an acceptable cached data protection
solution for years, there are numerous hard costs, labor costs
and risk factors associated with managing and replacing BBUs
aer the initial purchase has been made.
Adaptec by PMC RAID controllers with Zero-Maintenance
Cache Protection eliminate all these costs.
Monitoring
BBUs have a nite usable charge and require close monitoring of
battery health and charge levels. If the charge level deteriorates
below a certain level, immediate corrective action must be taken
to replace the battery to avoid any chance of data loss.
– Adaptec RAID controllers utilize NAND ash memory that doesn’t
degrade over time, eliminating the need for monitoring.
Instant Protection
BBUs usually have to be charged before they can actually be
used – a process that can take as long as 9 hours. During this
initial period users will experience lower response times from
the storage subsystem, as cache is not enabled until the battery
charge is complete. is can result in lost productivity.
– Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection is based on a capacitor which
charges while the system is booting. By the time your server has
booted, it is already fully protected.
Corrective Action on Power Loss
BBUs are typically rated to provide 72 hours of protection.
is means that in theory you have up to 72 hours to reboot a
server whose power has failed. Unfortunately, the lifespan of
BBUs isn’t innite and their ability to hold 72 hours worth of
charge gradually deteriorates over time. As a result you may
have substantially less time to recover power to a server than the
expected 72 hours. Depending on when an outage is discovered,
you may have to take emergency action to recover data.
– Using current NAND Flash technology, Adaptec RAID controllers
can store protected data for years with no degradation. You can
re-power your servers whenever it is most convenient for your
business.
Replacement
BBUs need replacing every 1-2 years. Even when planned well,
this usually requires the system to be taken oine and opened.
In addition to system downtime, this process adds maintenance
and personnel overhead.
– Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection needs no regularly scheduled
maintenance in a typical server lifespan, increasing system uptime
and dramatically reducing the overall total cost of ownership.
Disposal
Once BBUs have been replaced, the old ones require a careful
disposal process that adheres to strict hazardous material
standards. Even when disposal criteria are properly followed,
the toxic chemicals of the batteries are still introduced into
the environment with potentially harmful consequences.
–Adaptec RAID controllers face less restrictive disposal regulations,
eliminating related costs and dramatically reducing adverse
environmental eects.
ZMCP Saves you Real Money
While the logic behind the Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
approach is relatively compelling, the actual nancial impact is
even more so.
To compute these savings we must look at the ways that people
approach their existing BBU solutions. An interesting and
appropriate analogy is to look at the way that people treat the
oil in their cars.
At one end of the spectrum are the folk that take meticulous
care of their oil, changing it every 3,000 miles, just as it says
in the owner’s manual. ey continually monitor the oil and
“engine check” lights in their vehicles, and schedule oil changes
to work around their busy schedules.
At the other end of the spectrum are the folk that only react
when the oil light comes on. At this point they interrupt the
normal activities of themselves and their passengers and rush
o to change the oil, hoping that the car won’t seize up on them
while they’re actually driving to the nearest gas station.
We can use these analogies to compute the benet of the ZMCP
solution.
Savings for the meticulous BBU user
In this model we assume several things about the way that the
owner handles a card with a BBU
• eypurchaseanewbatteryeveryyear,asrecommended,
and keep a couple of replacements on hand all the time to
take care of unexpected events.
• eycarefullyscheduledowntimefortheiruserstochange
the battery. ey attempt to deploy a replacement device to
take up the load while the primary server is out of action.
Several folks in the IT department must usually coordinate
their eorts to make this happen.
• Replacementbatteriesareallowedtofullychargebefore
putting a system back into operation.
• Systemsarecontinuouslymonitoredtodetectafailingbattery.

Adaptec Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
ZERO-MAINTENANCE CACHE PROTECTION BRIEF
In this case we can assume that the chance of losing data due to
a power failure happening while the battery is out of action is
very small. To compute the cost of this methodology we include:
• Capitalexpenseofpurchasingbatteries—oneperyearforfour
years, plus one extra to take care of unexpected issues.
• OperatingITcosttoinstalltheinitialdevice,plandowntime,
replace batteries and re-charge them.
• Potential“overtime”or“disruption”costswhenapower
failure occurs and systems have to be turned back on within
the 72-hour battery charge window — potentially disrupting
other activities, or occurring during the night, on a weekend
or over a holiday period. Even in the best case, the pressure to
re-power systems has an impact.
• Productivityimpactonotherusers.
In an ideal world, the chance of losing data in the latter example
would be zero due to all the planning. However, in reality it
never is — people don’t get the “memo”, or they can’t modify
their plans to take alternative actions. For the sake of this
analysis, however, we assume that only a small number of people
are impacted, and then only to a small degree.
Computing the overall cost, therefore, we have:
Item Per Server Impact over 4 years Cost per item 4 year cost*
Batteries 5 $175 each $875
IT manpower
Initial Installation .5 hours $20/hour $10
Downtime Preparation 1.5 staff-hours, 3 times $30/hour $135
Battery Replacement 1 hours, 3 times $20/hour $60
Monitoring 30 seconds per day $20/hour $240
Productivity loss 5 people, 15% impact $40/hour $800
Activity Cost on Power
Loss
3 hours, 30% chance of
occurring, 8 incidents
$50/hour $360
Total $2,480
* Based on single server model.
Savings for the on-demand replacement BBU user
e second model to consider is the BBU user who waits for the
alert light to come on before doing anything. e major dierence
between this case and the last one is due to the unplanned nature
of the replacement, and consequently the number of people it
aects. ink again of the oil change analogy but instead of a
personal car, consider the impact on something larger, say a bus.
In this case, when the oil change light comes on, the driver has to
pull over to the side of the road and stop, and everyone on the bus
is impacted. Whatever they were planning to do has to be put on
hold while the problem is resolved.
To compute the impact of this scenario we make the following
assumptions:
• Areplacementbatteryhadbeenpurchasedatthetimeofthe
initial installation and is sitting on a shelf somewhere, ready to
go. Another new battery is purchased to replace this one.
• A“mini-panic”occurswhenthealerthappens.eserver
is immediately taken out of service and because this is an
unplanned event a relatively large number of people have their
daily work aected. ey may be forced to be idle until the
aected system is brought back online, or perhaps they can work
on something else, but the net result is some impact on their
productivity.
• Becauseusersarewaitingtogetbackontheaectedsystem,
replacement batteries are NOT allowed to fully charge before
putting the server back into operation. is minimizes the
amount (and cost) of downtime for each replacement, but
exposes the system to potential data loss while the battery is
charging. We assume the system takes two hours to x, and users
are allowed access aer another 3 hours — a net total of 5 hours
of lost work for each aected user.
• Systemsarecontinuouslymonitoredtodetectafailingbattery.
Item Impact over 4 years Cost per item 4 year cost
Batteries 3 $175 each $525
IT manpower
Initial Installation .5 hours $20/hour $10
Downtime Preparation 0 $30/hour $0
Battery Replacement 2 hours, once $20/hour $40
Monitoring 30 seconds per day $20/hour $240
Productivity loss 40 people, 100%
impact, 5 hours each
incident
$40/hour $8,000
Activity Cost on Power
Loss
3 hours, 30% chance
of occurring, 8
incidents
$50/hour $360
Lost Business Cost 2 hours of system
downtime, $50M per
year, 10% impact
$570/hour $1,140
Total $10,315
We also include an impact on the business itself since this type
of downtime is unscheduled. e cost of these instances is hard
to compute, and analyses performed by (self-interested parties)
tend to be hysterical in nature — sometimes as high as $500,000
per hour or more. We take a much more conservative approach
and simply assume that the impacted device has a 10% impact
on a business valued at $50 million per year.
Note that this number is optimistic for a number of reasons.
Apart from the fact that we’ve assumed a pretty rapid response
to the incident and that users are allowed back onto it before it is
fully protected again, we’ve not taken into account the fact that
this strategy actually exposes the system to data loss.

ZERO-MAINTENANCE CACHE PROTECTION BRIEF
Adaptec Zero-Maintenance Cache Protection
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
1380 Bordeaux Drive
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Tel: [phone]
© Copyright PMC-Sierra, Inc. 2011. All rights reserved. PMC, PMC-SIERRA and Adaptec are registered trademarks of PMC-Sierra, Inc. “Adaptec by PMC” is a trademark of PMC-Sierra, Inc.
Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. For a complete list of PMC-Sierra trademarks, see www.pmc-sierra.com/legal.
BF_ZMCP_022112_US Information subject to change.
World Wide Web: www.adaptec.com
Pre-Sales Support: US and Canada: 1 [phone] or [phone] or adapt[email protected]
UK: [phone] or [email protected]
Australia: [phone]
Singapore: [phone]
Estimating the cost of lost data is extremely hard to do. For
example, in smaller companies it may take more than 24 hours
to actually recover lost data causing further loss in productivity
and revenue. In some instances there is an additional nancial
impact due to the cost of replacing/repairing whatever business
impact may be caused by the loss — for example helping
customers for whom banking or credit card transactions have
gone missing.
In order to not oer ridiculous numbers that depend to a
large degree on the nature of individual businesses, we simply
comment that the strategy noted here has about a 1 in 700
chance of suering data loss (assuming that the system is
exposed for around 6 hours, and two power failures occur
per year).
The Bottom Line on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Obviously there are other scenarios that we could consider.
A favorite is to think of the driver who simply never changes
their oil — they drive the car and hope that it makes it through.
Sometimes you win, and the car makes it, sometimes you don’t
and the engine needs to be replaced.
Regardless of these, we have considered two reasonable cases
and the net result is:
Methodology Cost over 4-year Lifetime
Taking proper care of your BBU $2,480
Reacting to BBU emergencies $10,315 (Plus data loss risk)
Zero Maintenance Cache Protection Cost of the ZMCP module
Conclusion
By eliminating costly BBU technology and related expenses,
the Adaptec Series 6 (6Gb/sec), Series 6Q with maxCache 2.0
(6Gb/sec) and Series 5Z (3Gb/sec) family of RAID controllers
with Zero Maintenance Cache Protection oer the industry’s
most complete and ecient data protection solution available
today.